Cristache Gheorghiu
from Athens
isbn
Preface
I had read many books about Greece and Greeks still
before thinking to go there. Maybe just these readings have influenced me, and
the wish to know it has gradually metamorphosed into the desire to dwell there
– if not permanently – at least a part of the time. The mild climate, in
contrast to that of Brasov, was a supplementary argument, more and more
powerful as the years have left increasingly deep traces in my old bones.
Surprises – as, perhaps, expected – came as I began
to know the places and the people; they were both pleasant and unpleasant. If
the stones are the same from Homer’s time, the people are completely different.
I was convinced of this and not the ancients were those who had attracted me in
Greece, but relatively recent writings of some authors speaking about the
contemporary Greek, with his good and evils, with joys and sorrows associated,
with his soul, that seemed to me to be great and fascinating. But the
characters were contemporary with the authors, which leaved some hundred years
ago, and the soul of the authors was great, from their love for their
ethnicity, most of them living in Diaspora.
The Greeks of today, those that I met, are much
different, compared with the ancients, as well as to those of recent centuries.
These one are real people, also with their good and evils and different from
those from the past.
The explanation of the transformation of mentality
and behaviour of the Greek of nowadays is to be found and fully justified in
Greece's recent history; that of the period after acquiring its independence
against Turkey and, especially, after the Second World War.
The events lived by me, or those to which I was a
witness, struck me, seemed to me interesting and I thought that they deserves
to be noted. This book does not include travel notes or simple letters to my
wife. The form is a bookish artifice. The book is an essay, in which the
observations made here for nearly a year have served as support fore promoting
some more general ideas.
I gathered hare and translated from Romanian
language the volume „Scrisori din Atena” (Letters from Athens), printed in 2012
in a small number of copies, and the booklet „Grecia 2011” (Greece 2011), a
narration of my first contact with this country.
Peak manners
On the first day in
Athens, after a 24-hours journey by coach and a first walk through the city, I
was so tired, that, on the street, I gave priority to my own image, reflected
on the mirror of a newsstand on the pavement. Good luck that I recognised
myself pretty quickly; otherwise, maybe I would have tried a short
conversation.
The
streets of Athens are not crowded, but extremely crowded. The first
recommendation that is made to those coming here with their cars is to leave
them in parking. It is why the proportion of taxis in traffic is about fifty
percent. And among the cars, the motorcycles strain with speed, so that
crossing streets on other places than intersections with traffic lights is
impossible. Only there, all vehicles stop; not the pedestrians, who do not wait
for green colour, but immediately rush to cross in any tiny break.
* *
*
A remark
of a black man in New York is coming in my mind. He spoke it after a scene
involuntarily generated by myself: while I was trying to get information from
the dispatcher in a taxi station, a
driver were pretty aggressively protesting, with the absurd claim that he
should not give customer relationships. Later, I leave even with that taxi
driver. On the way I asked him what the dispatcher’s nationality is, because
his English was very approximate: what is his native language? The black man's
reply stunned me: "Which language? That guy does not know any language; he
is Greek." For him, there is not a Greek language; only his English - I
don't know if his accept the literary one - perhaps Spanish and Chinese have
the right to exist. I don't think he has an idea about the role of the Greek
language and culture in the European civilization and the American now. I
reported this happening also in the book "America after America ".
With ten lessons
from “Τα νέα
ελλινικά”, the practical course of Greek language, which I managed to read
from, I do not know Greek but I hope to learn more and – especially – to get an
idea about what the ancient Greek culture meant at its native place.
* *
*
There is a
receptionist at the hotel whose name is Christos, with accent on “i” for not
confounding with Jesus Christ, in Greek also Christos, but with accent on “o”.
The name is extremely frequent in Greece, and this need an explanation. Even my
name, Cristache, has a Greek origin,
(they call me Christakis) although I am not Greek.
Jesus Christ was
mentioned in the Greek text of the Gospel as Hristos Iisus
(Χριστός
Ιησούς); in Latin transliteration: Iesus
Christus. On the other hand, the Greek form for Hristós
(Χριστός), is a translation from the Hebrew
"mașiach" (Messiah), meaning "anointed", gold-plated.
As a mater of fact, in modern Greek language, “hrisós” means gold.
Now, we can explain
why there are in Greece so many first names of Christos. They come from a
common noun, which existed before Jesus Christ:
Χρυσός (hrisos), meaning gold, polished with
gold.
Acropolis cannot
miss from the smallest trip in Athens, at least because it is on the hill, but
not only for that. Down, Zeus’s Temple is maybe equally famous, but much less
spectacular.
In a small square,
just near the Roman Agora, at the base of the hill, someone was playing a
Cimbalom Italian music. I must say that he was very good, and the instrument
sounds fabulous in his hands. The last time when I saw a Cimbalom was in 1959
or 1960, in a tavern in Bucharest, singing – obviously – music suitable with
that place. This time, I had to revise my opinion on the instrument. The truth
is that, technically, he is not even a little a rudimentary one. On the
contrary, it is even very pretentious and perhaps
just
this seems to be the reason because of which people abandoned it.
(In another day, in
the same square, somebody sang a guitar, also Italian music. I would be sat
there the whole day, but I still had to visit a lot of other places.)
Roman
Agora is remarkable for Hadrian’s Library and the Tower of Winds. It is
comforting to loiter there, but I have to climb the hill. Toward Acropolis, I
avoided the roads and climbed a path, meandering among the rocks. The way up
was pleasant.
After
hours of riding on highways or walking narrow and very crowded streets, a mountain
path is something from another world.
* *
*
Here, on the hill,
I found that almost all Greece is on the marble, or almost. I said almost,
because the difference between limestone and marble is only of the quality,
both being based on the calcite. The one from here has much iron, visible by
some insertions, which changes the reddish defect in a particularly aesthetic
effect.
Everywhere,
you step on marble. Around Acropolis, stone is so polished by the feet of
millions of visitors, that the pavement is very slippery. In wet whether, the
climb maybe problematical.
* *
*
Now,
I am in a place called Ários Págos (Άρειος
Πάγος) and I try to put down a few
impressions, even the bustle of tourists is intense and loud. They come around,
take photos and depart.
The name of the
place causes to me a slight confusion (if it was not just its goal). The
translation, accredited by a tourist guide, is "The Stone of Ares",
Ares being the god of war in Greek mythology. It is not specified whether it
was his stone tomb – although the gods, being immortals, didn't need graves and
the less tombstones – or a stone that someone would have hung at his foot, in
order of diminishing his warlike soar. I admit, this interpretation is a
personal one and comes from my affinity for the moral sense of Greeks’
mythology. The translation is obviously wrong. In another dictionary, I found a
different interpretation for págos. It is ice, which has no connection
with Ares and even less with the clime of the place. This time, the error comes
from the wrong using of modern language dictionary and not of the old one, in
which págos means a piece of rock. Yes, the "The Rock of Ares"
makes sense. Here, probably, the god used to come to take upsurge, or for
silence.
A second
interpretation, probably closer to the truth, comes from areopag. The
toponymy is the same, but the meaning is different. The term defined The
Supreme Court in Athens of 7-5 BC centuries: a forum, consisting of
philosophers and artists of great skill, who used to judge the most serious
problems of the city and its citizens. It is said that there were the place of
the meetings of the Tribunal, although it seems unlikely, because of the
difficulty of climbing, too tedious for some old people, because the members of
that tribunal, nine in number, were elected among the elders people, who
demonstrated their high qualities of model citizens. O tempora, o mores!
(Poor Cicero ...)
Anyway,
using the hill for two activities so different it is not beneficial either for
the supporters of the war and for those of the justice, granted by a court.
But, let’s suppose that the elder members of the Tribunal were taken up there
with a lectic or something similar. Instead, those who were seeking justice had
to climb the path on foot: an excellent opportunity to observe the difficulty
of obtaining it.
This was occurring
then, many centuries ago. Now, out of urban bustle, the climb – albeit equally
tedious – is an opportunity of relaxing, especially since on the top there is
nobody to judge us. Judges of nowadays are down, sometimes very down. (To
forgive me those from Greece, as I do not know them. My thought is heading
towards what I know, although I like not to think of them.
I am still
wondering why the modern justice is based on the idea that an ensemble of laws
must be perfect (if it is not yet, it can be improved), and trials must be
conducted according to the rules and not following judges’ reason and
judgement, even if they may be wrong. The idea of an ideal law code would be
great, if not utopian. We know very well the effect of a similar concept: the
ideal communist society. Any idea of perfection in real life already denotes an
unacceptable level of ignorance. Where we are moving with conceptions?
Going through
Propylaea? I had the feeling that I was fulfilling a ritual of initiation, a
passage through a gate - it just is a gate - mostly because the advancing
through the crowd of tourists was quite difficult; you should work for it, to
be active. Of course, the imposing columns impress, but once you overcome the
gates, you feel to pass at a higher level, after successful completion of that ritual.
On the top, you are in the area of high spheres, as above only the sky is. Even
the sea, visible in the days with clear atmosphere, is somewhere underneath.
Maybe Athens is not a city of the top, but Acropolis is "the city from the
top". You are there after you went through Propylaea.
The same day, evening
I don't know how I
would have reacted today at the happening of yesterday, when, passing through a
narrow place, I gave priority to myself, actually to my image reflected in a
mirror. After a sunny day, during which I walked from morning till night, my
face is so red that I had a shock when I saw myself in the mirror. The speed of
the reaction would have been much different and who knows what other gestures
would have done.
* *
*
An idle
thought: one of the capital punishments in the past was the killing with
stones, in Greek language “lapidare”. I could speculate and say that
dilapidation is an act that would be punished in this way: by stoning. If it
had to be applied today, I guess that in Romania there are not enough stones.
It seems that what
was inevitable has occurred. Among the many of my defects – known and unknown –
the tendency of generalizing excessively is often invoked by friends. I admit,
I like to do that, but here, in Greece, where I am for several days, any
attempt of identification some general characteristics of people hits by its
opposite. To say about Greeks that are friendly, for example, is very true.
They are particularly helpful as possible. When I asked an aged gentleman for a
piece of information, he immediate requested the help of a young man, which –
in his turn - landed another guy who was just walking around, so that, finally,
my question becomes subject of a public debate in full street. I say 'finally'
because I left, but their discussion went on. It happened in Lavrio, near the
southern extremity of the Attic peninsula, where I was looking for a host.
Yes, Greek people
are very communicative. In tram, bases, stations everywhere, they started
discussions with anyone happens to be there, without knowing someone. Usually
do it persons over 40 years old. Obviously, not all of them and never young
people!
In
addition, I must obvious their appetite for conversation; they talk much, loud
and very fast. So quickly that you have the impression that they have in their
mouths a device that rotates sounds with over 1,000 spins per minute. Contrary
to expectations, not the women but men are those who do it mainly. (Do not make
illusions; the women talk less but scream terrible.) Returning to their
kindness, if a personal interest appears, any interlocutor may be a potential
victim for a Greek, no matter of the sex.
As for women, if
two young Greek ladies meet each other by chance, after the using kissing, a
dialogue follows, tolerable only if you have earplugs in your ears. If there
are not two but three or four, then you think about the gees from Capitol -
which have woken the Romans with their cries, rescuing them by invaders in the
year 390 BC – and, by comparison, you imagine them as some peaceable nuns,
making prayers in soto voce. More than four young Greek ladies cannot be
covered even by another similar group, with which they may done a coral, I
would say of Wagnerian style, if you replace the brass instruments with female
voices and musical harmony with non-musical cacophonous. By the way, as
expecting, cacophonous is a Greek word; you can easily decode it (bad sound).
Kaka exists in Romanian language too with the meaning faeces in the conversation
of parents with the kids. As a witness to such a true spectacle, for
preservation your health, the only alternative is to go away as much, because
even the medicine is overcome in such cases. After 25 years, there are little
chances to meet each other; as a rule, they are single and smoke. Later, they
sob and sigh. The exceptions are those who scream hysterically.
* *
*
Another finding
refers to the label of Greece as "tourist country”. It is true, but only
for those objectives specially dedicated for this purpose: Acropolis, Athos and
the monasteries in the North, some portions of the coastline and several
islands, entered in the registers of tourist agencies. In the rest of the
territory there is no concern for tourism. With all those 15,000 kilometres of
coastline, due to its sinuous territory, the Greeks don't go to the beach. I
remember that, in the University, I had several colleagues from North Korea, a
country with pretty enough seaside for its area. They were very surprised to
learn that, in Romania, the coastline enjoys of demand just due to its beaches.
In one of their holidays, they did a trip throughout the country, during which
they have visited the Romanian seaside resorts as well. The boys had thrown
only a look from the distance to the beach. Not because they would not be
interested, but because they must report to superiors what they had saw. The
girls did not approached at all; public exposure of nude bodies was more than
immoral, in their conception.
The Greeks are,
however, Europeans and do not have such conceptions, but the beach does not
interest them. It is no wonder, if I think that, in Romania, the inhabitants at
the foot of the mountain do not practice climbing or skiing. Most Romanians
climbers are from Bucharest. As to the inhabitants of the seacoast or from the
localities near some riverfront, many of them do not know to swim. It seems
that people don't appreciate what they have; they want what lacks them, if they
learn that it exists. There is, however, an explanation: people from the foot
of the mountains and those from the banks of the rivers are marked by the
tribute in victims during the ages. They have learned to give them respect. For
such people, the water and the mountains are places of job and not for fun.
In Lavrio, all
those that I asked were surprised by my questions, and were amazed that I
wanted to rent an apartment in their locality, only for its climate and the
vicinity of the sea. The Aegean Sea! It is said that Theseus, the son of King
Aegeus told to his father that – if he will kill the Minotaur – when he will
return, on the way home, he will replace the black canvas of the ship with some
white one but – happy after the victory – he forgot. When the father saw the
ship with black canvas drowned himself into the sea. Since, the sea was called
the Aegean Sea. Today, on the tiny beach from Lavrio, there was nobody, though
the day was superb. Anyway, if Teseu’s father indeed thrown into the sea, he
did it from a high shore and not from the sand of the beaches with smooth
inclination.
* *
*
Throughout the
Attic Peninsula, which I traversed from Athens as far as the southern
extremity, I did not see villages. Nor modest houses! In that few old towns,
the houses are crowd. Instead, in the rest of the territory, villas are spread
everywhere. Judging by their position, they are not summer residences of some
reach people. Most are located in the middle of orchards, olive groves and
other crops, so they are the houses of farmers in the area. Again, the Greeks
are not attracted by the seaside or even by valleys, where they could find
water, almost non-existent here.
Looking for a host,
I sent a few messages on the Internet. Among the responses I received from a
lady the question: "You are Cristache Gheorghiu the Romanian writer?"
You imagine how proud I felt. Those few books in English have made me known in
a greater extent than everything I did in Romanian during a life.
* *
*
People coming into
Athens by bus are set down and possibly stay in the vicinity of Omonia Square.
My wife and I stayed here as well, in a hotel of two stars, but that would be
received much more; only the bathroom was small, but the cleanliness and
services were perfect. Although the area is close to the centre of the town and
to Acropolis, the hotels in the area are cheap, and the food-market is famous.
But any advantage must have a downside. In the northern part of Omonia Square,
the most immigrants lie here: Russians, Asians, Africans. The most recent
massive waves are from South Asia, in particular the Bangladesh, and Africa.
The label "bad famed” is not very far away, but the impressions collected
here have nothing in common with other areas of Athens.
Besides
its history, Greece is part of the European Union for a long time, so it is
expected to see something different as well. That something different becomes
visible once you leave Omonia Square and, on the way toward Syntagma Square
(Constitution square), on Eleftheriou Venizelou Street, where the Municipal Library,
University and Academy, are to be found on the left side.
The
buildings are relatively recent, but suggesting the ancient architecture, with
statues of some nowadays personalities together with some mythological ones,
among which that of the goodness Athena could not be missing.
In Syntagma Square
the building of the Parliament is located.
Behind it, there is
a huge park, with plants of all kinds, and, in the opposite corner, the former
Royal Palace, now Presidential.
From
Syntagma Square, toward the East, on the left side of Sofias Avenue, opposite
to the park, the buildings remember us some images from films of the great
capitals of the world, especially in countries with tropical climate. Greece is
clearly one of them. Most of the buildings are of certain embassies.
Behind
them, on the relatively narrow streets, climbing toward Lycabettus Hill, we
guess houses of the Athenians with more elevated claims.
On Lycabettus Hill,
visible from almost anywhere, besides the ruins of an ancient temple, there is
a functional theatre, which can be reached by a lift.
* *
*
Asking for how to
reach to Royal Palace, I didn’t get the necessary information from required
persons, although it was not far away. The one who pulled out me from the
impasse was an Englishman. Besides, he made to me the recommendation of no
longer asking for Royal Palace but for the Presidential Palace. In Romania,
people still use the term "Royal Palace", possibly the “former Royal
Palace”, although we no longer have a king. To have forgotten the Greeks that
they had a King, or no longer want to know? Greece declared its independence in
1821, in 1928 ended the war of independence, and in 1833 became a monarchy, so
before Romania. In 1973 they gave up at the monarchy, so that after Romania,
which became a republic in 1947, and not by his own will, but under Soviet
occupation.
This reminds me
that, in 1995, during a holiday in Eforie Sud
– a Romanian spa - I found that almost all inhabitants did not know that the
old name of their city was Carmen Silva, the queen’s pseudonym who founded it.
Instead, some older ones remember that their town was called for a while Vasile
Roaita, after the name of a minor communist fighter.
In the case of the Greeks, the subject may be political, and their
attitude explainable for a people with a very high sense of patriotism and
therefore heavily involved in politics. In the case of the Romanians, it is
mere ignorance and disregard of his own history.
Finally,
I arrived at the Palais Royal/Presidential-nominee. It is behind the Central
Park, just the opposite size with the Parliament. There, we had the chance to
watch the changing of the guard, a truly funny show, with soldiers equipped as
“evzone” and odd movements. The same spectacle is the front of the Parliament.
Instead
of a description - which wouldn’t do but a vague suggestion of reality - I made
a few videos. One of them I've placed on YouTube.
The address on YouTube is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKrM9AzcD40
Clicking
on the photo could access it.
From Syntagma
Square, but toward the West, one can reach on the coast, and the port of
Piraeus. The distance is great, so it is recommended the subway or, much
better, the tram, from which one can admire the city. It Worth! Theoretically,
your own car would be a solution – the worst one, due to the congestion of the
traffic - or the taxi – an unnecessary expense.
Piraeus, an
independent port in the past is now part of Athens.
Proving its ancient
age stands the famous statue known as “Lion of Piraeus”, or “PortoLeone”, as it
was took
in Venice in 1688, during the Venetian occupation, where it still guard the
Arsenal. It has a long history. This one is a copy, but looks very nice in the
landscape.
And,
speaking about the landscape, next to the port, there is a nice and quiet of
houses. Here, the coastline is beautiful. There are not beaches with sand, only
stones, but it is nice.
Once on the shore,
the tram turns to the South and goes up to Voula, passing through a continuous
string of upscale resorts.
Glifada, among
them, with shops and elegant buildings on the left side and the sea on the
right side.
We spent two
wonderful days there, walking on the beaches, with Sun of 30-Celsius degrees in
April.
Maybe, the sand
from the beaches is not very good, but water and ear are wonderful.
Palm
trees are everywhere and orange trees as well, in foliage of which there are
fruits not picked by anyone, not even by beggars (there are enough of them).
Their orange colour makes a contrast with the intense green of the leaves, so
that these trees truly are some decorative ones.
I mentioned Voula,
because up till there the tram arrives, and this is important, being the most
and single civilized mean of transport in Athens.
Of course, one may
go farther, to Varkiza, Vouliagmenis and others, by bus. It is not the same
comfortable, but the effort is fully rewarded by the beauty of the landscape.
* *
*
Of course, the
central point of attraction in Athens is Acropolis Hill. It is visible from
anywhere, so you can get there on many ways.
From Omonia Square,
the shortest path is on Stadiou street parallel with Eleftheriou Venizelou, but
without its elegance, but marked instead by lots of shops for tourists. The
most known is the famous Central Market with it Fish Market.
This is the single
shop in Athens where fresh fish is to be found at low prices. I do not why fish
is very expensive here.
Also,
another question mark I have about olives. Besides the numerous plantations,
there are full of olive trees even on the trees. People prepare them by
themselves, but in the market and shops they are very expensive.
* *
*
At the
foot of Acropolis, Plaka and Monastiraki are two spaces just good to be avoided
in crowded days, even attractive in the others.
Still,
both have a charm, just due to the crowd. Everywhere you look there are small
shops looking like a bazaar. The spectacle of tourist is similar with that in
Las Vegas, but that of the shops is different, almost opposite. Arts – good and
less good – jewellery, footwear, memories and clothes; clothes, clothes and
clothes all over
the place.
Are you hungry? No chance!
There are too many offers and it is hard to resist.
Besides
hundreds of market stalls, small locals style fast food, lot of restaurants
inside but mostly outside are in your way, and guys insistently invite you to
sit dawn at a table. You will eat before being hungry.
* *
*
Monastiraki is a
winder plate. At the foot of Acropolis, from here go streets to all directions:
Plaka, Roman Agora, Ancient Greek Agora and, of course, Acropolis.
In Greek Agorá
is to be found, the place where Socrates used to address to the people. Now
upgraded, it is dedicated exclusively to trade. Also, one says that even the
Apostle Paul would have preached here his sermon to the Athenians (Acts 17).
About Acropolis it
is not need to write. Millions of other visitors did it before me, and the
minimal information does not escape to any tourist guide.
In translation,
Acropolis means "the upper town". Almost each large locality has one
“upper town”, but this is the most famous. Fun for me is the American name for
the centre of cities: downtown, namely “the city from bottom”, and even more
cute is that, in Los Angeles, is located up, on a hill.
* *
*
Socrates left
nothing written to us. But did he know to write? Few people dare to advance
such assumptions. Besides, it would not be interesting. At that time, the
philosophy – and not only it - was mostly orally, and the rhetoric was one of
the most important educational disciplines. Even today, Greek writing is very
difficult, but also inconsistent. There are, for example, at least five
modalities for writing the sound "i". Consequently, it makes
difficult any attempt to look for a word received by hearing in the dictionary.
Instead, there were not sign for the sound "u".
Written or not-written,
Socrates kept his philosophical dialogues with real people, with topics on
their interest and meaning, since they accept the discussions. Something from
the mentality of that time was preserved, because the Greeks discusses today
with passion. What they discusses I don't know, but I know that discusses. I
found it.
* *
*
Before
leaving for this trip, I had bought a book of Greek Language, from which I had
learned more than half, so that I was curious to know if I could handle with
what I knew. The first finding was that the Greeks knowing foreign languages
are happy to put their knowledge in value and, consequently, they are not
interested to listen someone that mangles their mother language. The others are
happy to talk their language but, unfortunately, it use for nothing, because
the answer comes as a torrent of sounds, unintelligible because of the
pronunciation in the dialect, as – most notably – due to the fantastic speed in
which they speak.
Learning, however,
I noted the similarity with Romanian language. And I'm not talking about the
neologisms, which have came into our language by scientific ways, but about
those words entered for a long time in the core of the language. It was
supposed to have such words. Surprise – at least for me – was their number. And
it's not only those with the same meaning, but also some that have changed the
meaning, got a limited meaning, or, conversely, those that have given a
completely different significance. Thus, from χορóσ
(the Greek for dance), in Romanian language we have “hora” (a particular
dance); from áσχημος (a Greek adjective
for ugly), we have “aschimodie”, a very lean and ugly man. It is not
appropriate to insist; examples are countless and handy to reach by anyone who
has a dictionary. There are funny words even inside of Greek language. For
example leftá , means the money, but lefteriá means freedom. The
Romanians went farther and delivered a variant more original: lefter
means penniless.
A disappointing finding
came from another direction. The dictionary of Romanian language recorded many
words as being of Slavonic origin. I knew that Soviet propaganda exaggerated
Slavonic influence. Its size surprised me now, and especially the fact that
such errors still lay in some dictionaries. They went so far as some religious
terms are presented of Slavonic origin, though the Romanians were Christians
much before the Slavs. The source of these words is, obviously, Greece. Only a
Russian pseudo-scholar could invent such explanations and some Romanian
traitors accepted it. (I think, if Stalin had lived a few years more, we would
have learned that Jesus Christ himself would have been by Russian origin.)
How about the
Greeks, they are still today one of the most faithful Christian people and it
is proved by lots of churches, full of people, from those large and beautiful,
until some extremely small ones, remaining from the times of many generations.
Sometimes, only a cross above or beside the door of the entrance indicates to
the passer-by that inside there is a church.
Today,
talking about the Slavs, the majority of less trained people have in view the
Russians. Walking through the U.S.A., I was tempted to try out the Americans’
knowledge about the Cyrillic alphabet. The almost unanimously responses
indicated Russia, not knowing that its authors (the brothers Cyril and
Methodius) never went there. The idea of slavering could catch only the
ignorant masses.
From any
book of history we learn that the origin of Slavic migration was the territory
of nowadays Poland. It appears that the original Slavic language must be found
in Polish language. Obviously, Polish, like any language, underwent influences
from its neighbours, particularly Germans and Swedes, with whom they had
numerous conflicts. About the Romanian language, we know that it was composed
from the mixture of Dacians and Romans and subsequent influences. But the
Russian language how did it formed? Regardless of which its core would be, in
addition to the Slavonic language, one must analyse the influences of
Ural-Altaic peoples during their migration and those of people conquered by
imperial expansion. Greek words entered in Russian language on two ways:
through the Christianisation and from equestrian Ural-Altaic people, when they
sat down.
Slavonic influence
in Romanian language? Sure there is, but not to the extent that they claim.
Obviously, in the middle are the well-known political influences. The first
remark is one of logical nature. Russia has not reached the extension of today
but in recent centuries. In the past, one could speak about Slavic language
only in the northwest part of it. Many centuries, nomadic people, more or less
aggressive, in continuous motion, occupied the southern territory. Is the space
through which have touched Tatars, Huns, Cumans, Pechenegs and very many
others.
Well, I don't know
how the Tatars, which the Russians were adjacent hundreds of years, were
speaking. Also, I know nothing about the languages of the endless strings of nomads,
but we found that many Russian words, designating objects of dwelling or
household tasks are similar with some Greek ones. It is clear that the nomads,
when they began to build stable housing, assimilated words from existing people
in the area in which they sat down. For words that are identical in Greek,
Romanian and Russian it is clear that the source was Greek, and not Slavonic,
so the process is inverse to that insinuated by Soviet political propaganda.
Why the trend of
slavering still continues among some Romanians philologists I don't know.
It is 9 o’clock in
the evening and we are leaving. It is said that the Amazons, those all-female
warriors from Greek mythology, lived somewhere besides Pont-Euxin. The
direction would be so good.
Through Greece we
will go during the night. Coming here, also during the night, I was impressed
by the highway, partially lightened and by the lot of tunnels and viaducts.
Now, it is supposed that I will sleep. A travel of about 24 hours expects us.
* *
*
In Bucharest, we
had a humorous happening, though, at first was annoying. Here, all those going
toward Sibiu via Brasov changed the coach with a microbus. A lady was doing a
huge riot because her suitcase had been dirtied. It was a nice pretty small
suitcase with a drawing in open colour. It place was not among the huge luggage
of most travellers. It was her mistake putting her suitcase in the trailer for
large luggage. But, her hysterical behaviour has another explanation, I think. It
was her way for attracting attention. As the results were still expected, she
intensified her efforts so that, over the time, she used to give a true
spectacle, with opposite effects face to those desired. The minibus had left
and she continues to roar, although those involved in the carriage of baggage
was no longer present. All people were irritated. Then, someone had the idea to
tell to the driver: "Put some music, Sir." In a playfully, other
replicas followed on the same theme: "Put some bouzouki", "Give
the music louder". The joke amused all passengers, they laugh and, thus,
the woman was silent. I don't know if she understood that her strategy was
wrong, but it was done quietly. Of course, bouzouki would not be covered the
noise, but this was not important, any longer.
Bouzouki is an
instrumental music, which must be listened in quiet. It is characterized by an
intense experience of each sound. In fact the term first designates the
instrument, a kind of mandolin, and secondly the musical genre played on this
instrument.
Speaking about the
genre, remarkable is its approximation to Spanish music. Although each has its
well-defined specificity – anyone can discern between flamingo and bouzouki –
we find in both the same nerve and deep feeling, with rhythm and sounds
strongly marked. I would think that it is a specific Mediterranean, if in the
middle would not be Italy, with a style totally different, relaxing and,
mostly, joyful.
Between Sinaia and
Predeal it was snowing.
I got home. The
ideal city, to which we maybe dreamed, is - of course - utopian. The “Golden
Age” of Athens ended with its victory over Sparta, at the end of the
Peloponnesian War. (God, forbid us by victories!) Athens of today, the real
one, has all the known defects of any other large capital, but also several
special features, which helps us to build the ideal city in our souls.
What
would we do it? What we have in common, today, with those Greeks from thousands
of years ago? Now 3,000 years ago, at Delphi, most of the questions were the
same as nowadays: what career to pursue a young person, whether to have or not
confidence in the boy/girl offering to be a partner for life, or – in
assumption that he/she has one – whether he/she is devoted or not, etc. Why we
think that, in the meantime, we have evolved?
Maybe because we
imagine that we built the Horn of abundance for everyone? The Greeks imagined
it only for Amalthea, the goat who breastfed Zeus. No, the Horn of abundance is
not for everyone; only for goats and not for all of them. The goats settle for
less. Men are greedy. They will never be satisfied, so that abundance will be a
dream never came true, existing only in fairy tales.
Cicero said that
Socrates “brought philosophy from Heaven on Earth”. This is due to its realism.
As, in the meantime, the modern “philosophers” have buried it, today we should
dig it up and brought to the surface. But, who is to do it?
* *
*
Some people said
that the wars described by Homer were, in fact, some minor battles and only the
writer's talent would raised high them in rank. It appears that about the
heroes we could say the same thing. Even Odysseus, seems to have been only a
big sly-boots. Therefore, thanks to Homer, the Greeks would have a glorious
past.
"At
your great past, a great future will be". It is my poor translation of a
line from a famous Romanian poem. For us, it was a desire, a wish. But for the
Greeks? The future of Greece did not seem to be great, but the simple fact that
it exists for some millennia, of which the last two were under foreign
occupation, is a proof that he had – and still has – a great future. A few
countries can boast with a similar one, maybe no one. But, as not the Trojan
war was great, but Homer’s opera and of others writers like him, it appears
that no political dimension should be taken in view, but the cultural
dimension. They, the Greeks, from this point of view, have a past really great,
and this is their organic explanation. That doesn't mean that all Greeks are
men of culture. If, however, in a coffee-shop - a space in which Greeks
traditionally spend their evenings at a cup of words – you try to put in doubt
the value of culture or anything else of the Greek origin, you are lost: you
will no longer able to say a word; all people from that Café become a rostrum
addressing only to you and combating you. What's right, if Achilles, Ajax, and
others were heroes of novel, their followers – with or without famous names –
are real patriots and thus the power of this people is explainable.
I don't know if
what missing us is Achilles or Homer. (Do not think to Elena!) I think that,
before anything, we need some facts, be they and smaller, but started from good
intentions.